
Until I read the public smack down by Cardinal William J. Levada, I was just a reader musing over the coincidence of two NYTimes articles about activist nuns published on the same day: one (Sister Megan Rice) who broke into the Oak Ridge nuclear reservation in Tennessee and the 900 nuns who met at the Leadership Conference of Women Religious this week in St. Louis, Missouri.
Click here to read Sister Rice's story. Excerpt:
"Now, Sister Megan Rice, 82, a Roman Catholic nun of the Society of the Holy Child Jesus, and two male accomplices have carried out what nuclear experts call the biggest security breach in the history of the nation’s atomic complex, making their way to the inner sanctum of the site where the United States keeps crucial nuclear bomb parts and fuel.
“Deadly force is authorized,” signs there read. “Halt!” Images of skulls emphasize the lethal danger.
With flashlights and bolt cutters, the three pacifists defied barbed wire as well as armed guards, video cameras and motion sensors at the Oak Ridge nuclear reservation in Tennessee early on July 28, a Saturday. They splashed blood on the Highly Enriched Uranium Materials Facility — a new windowless, half-billion-dollar plant encircled by enormous guard towers — and hung banners outside its walls."
Unable to locate any fact-neutral reports on the edict at the center of the conference meeting, click here to read a comprehensive albeit conservative view. Click here to read the story of the conference of nuns' decision to use dialogue to resolve issues with the Vatican powers. Excerpt.
"The decision to seek a dialogue came after more than 900 nuns spent four days doing what they call “listening to the Holy Spirit” inside a hotel ballroom. They represent about 80 percent of the 57,000 Catholic nuns in the United States. They were responding to an edict issued in April by Cardinal Levada’s office, which ordered three American bishops to rewrite the Leadership Conference’s statutes, evaluate its programs and publications, and revise its liturgies and rituals.
The Vatican accused the group of promoting “radical feminist themes incompatible with the Catholic faith” and “corporate dissent” against church teachings, like those prohibiting the ordination of women to the priesthood, same-sex relationships and artificial birth control." [Emphasis added.]
Besides the tone of activism, having a voice, being visible, being heard, and the desire to use dialogue to resolve disputes, what unites these two stories with mine? I am one of the kids who went to Catholic school where we were taught by nuns. I'm also one of the kids who was taken to the church rectory and abused by the pastor. No one believed me. Years later I spoke publically to incest survivors about my experience and learned that they, too, were told to be quiet.
When it comes to the treatment and exclusion of women in the Catholic Church, Cardinal William J. Levada's dismissive retort says it all. He called the nuns’ approach a “dialogue of the deaf.”
Catholics and others are taking sides in the stand-off between the Vatican that wants to "reign in" the women religious and the nuns who want to be be “recognized as equal in the church,” to have their style of religious life “respected and affirmed,” and to help create a climate in which everyone in the church can talk about “issues that are very complicated.”
Why do they want this? The nuns expect that "open and honest dialogue may lead not only to increasing understanding between the church leadership and women religious but also to creating more possibilities for the laity, and particularly for women, to have a voice in the church.”
Who benefits? How about society, for a start.
The Vatican certainly has its hands full if it believes that women will go away or turn a deaf ear to our common humanity. If there is any "dialogue of the deaf," it's the Church that hasn't been listening.
It's way beyond the time that the Church fathers finally recognized "the times they are a-changing."
Recent Comments