It all started innocently enough.
I was reading Gail Collins' editorial in the NYTimes, "The New Anti-Abortion Math." According to Collins, Texas Governor Perry is blaming President Obama for a financial megacrisis in his state. That's not news. But what makes Texas' problems news to us is that...
"Texas is producing a huge chunk of the nation’s future work force with a system that goes like this:
• Terrible sex education programs and a lack of access to contraceptives leads to a huge number of births to poor women. (About 60 percent of the deliveries in Texas are financed by Medicaid.) Texas also leads the nation in the number of teenage mothers with two or more offspring.
• The Texas baby boom — an 800,000 increase in schoolchildren over the last decade — marches off to underfunded schools. Which are getting more underfunded by the minute, thanks to that little tax error.
And naturally, when times got tough at the State Capitol, one of the first things the cash-strapped Legislature tried to cut was family planning.
“It’s in total danger,” said Fran Hagerty, who leads the Women’s Health and Family Planning Association of Texas.
One of the best family-planning efforts in Texas is the Women’s Health Program, which provides an annual health exam and a year’s worth of contraceptives to poor women. For every dollar the state puts into the plan, the federal government provides $9.
The state estimates the pregnancies averted would reduce its Medicaid bill by more than $36 million next year. But when a budget expert told the Texas House Committee on Human Services that the program saved money, he was laced into by Representative Jodie Laubenberg for using “government math.”" [Emphasis added.]
Now I don't want to get in the middle of Texas and it problems. Heaven knows we have our share out here on the Left Coast in California. But doesn't it make sense to spend some time, money and effort to help educate our girls and women to "avoid unwanted pregnancies in the first place"? If we can stop the horse from getting out of the barn we won't have to worry about chasing it across the field.
Query: What holds us back from talking about sex, if not reproduction? Is it fear, fiscal conservatives, resistance to government involvement in the contraceptive business, social issues, religious issues, political issues, squeamish issues, or all of the above? What makes sex and reproduction such a non-topic of reasonable, rational, informed discussion? I think Collins nailed it on the head here, "We are currently stuck with a politics of reproduction in which emotion is so strong that actual information becomes irrelevant."
Query: Can you see how the law and lawyers get involved? One can look to just about any aspect of our society and see the crisis of failing to address unwanted pregnancies with information and education: juvenile concerns, marriage and family counseling, landlord-tenant disputes, domestic violence, health, legislation, school drop-out rates, crime, and so on. It's all connected. When actual information is irrelevant the actual conditions in which we live also become irrelevant.
So, how do vibrators come in to the mix? Hilary Howard had the journalistic chutzpah to write an article, "Vibrators On a Shelf Near You," and the NYTimes editor carried it on the front page of the "Fashion & Style" section as if someone really wanted you to read it. How could I not?
Rather than bore you with the details of personal massage devices, self-stimulation, and a "Sex in the City" episode - you can read it all in the privacy of your own time - let me point out what caught my ear: Dr. Laura Berman and her advice to mothers of young girls.
Dr. Laura Berman of “In the Bedroom with Dr. Laura Berman,” on OWN: Oprah Winfrey Network, is a prominent sex and relationship expert:
"Dr. Berman.... has a line of sex toys (drlauraberman.com), which she said grossed $5 million in 2010, up from $100,000 in 2005. After one appearance on “Oprah” that focused on adult women who had problems climaxing, one of her top-selling products, the Aphrodite, “was back-ordered forever,” she said. And in 2006 she sparked a national debate when she encouraged mothers to buy vibrators for their teenage daughters. “If she gets hot and bothered on a date,” Dr. Berman said about the daughter, “she can go home and self-stimulate, instead of getting pregnant.”
In light of Collins' editorial, what got me thinking was that Dr. Berman's advice rang a bit cavalier. Is it really as easy all that? Go home and self stimulate? Perhaps it is one solution. Although, as Howard notes, "(Of course, a plastic battery-powered device is not needed for self-stimulation, but there is no market potential in that idea.)"
I believe that the discussions about reproduction are considerably more nuanced. For me, the reasons we human beings "hook up" seem to be as many and as varied as the humans doing the 'hooking up', if you will: comfort, bragging rights, affection, bullying, expression, release, procreation, acceptance, belonging, and mis-information - to name only a very few.
Here's what I would like to see happen as part of the growing discussion on sex, reproduction, our rights, and our responsibilites:
- We will begin to infuse the politics of sex and reproduction with a spirit of actual, reasonable, accurate information and education;
- Men and women, boys and girls will involve themselves in anti-bullying efforts at home, in the community, and in cybersexspace;
- Human beings will be dignified and respected for who they are as people, not sexual objects to be exploited in a marketplace;
- [Fill in the blank with what you want to see happen]; and,
- [Fill in another].