
Typically, depositions are now recorded in some mode of videography to preserve the testimony in real time.
Later, during focus group research, mock trials, settlement conferences, mediations and courtroom testimony clips of the witnesses' depositions may be played for a variety of purposes. For example, the litigation consultant may wish to test the credibility of a particular witness; the attorney may wish to show some discrepancies in the opposing party's expert opinions; or the trial attorney may use the film in place of a witness who cannot attend trial, to impeach a witness or to further develop the legal story. Many trial attorneys are familiar with a trial tool called Sanction Litigation Software to make powerful use of deposition testimony.
More often than not in each of these scenarios and others a scrolling text of the testimony appears in sync with the deponent's spoken words. As one who enjoys foreign films I've gotten accustomed to watching the action on the screen while reading the subtitles. The experience is similar when I attend an opera in its original German or Italian; but the "subtitles" often scroll across the top of the stage.
However, no matter how carefully one watches and listens, the effect is the same: you may end up sacrificing a bit of visual and auditory attention to get the best of both worlds: accurate understanding and interpretation of the story being told.
I raise this so you might ask yourself whether the synced text is a help or a hindrance to advancing the decision-maker's comprehension. In which situations does it help you tell the legal story and persuade to your point? How might it hinder you from getting that point across?
I believe it comes down to the purpose for which you are using the clip of the deposition testimony while keeping in mind decision-makers learn differently. One might be distracted by the scrolling text while another needs it to clarify what she hears.
To decide whether to scroll or not to scroll for comprehension, recall what you know about the best PowerPoint presentations. Or the presentation secrets of Steve Jobs. Often, more is less (yes, I meant to write it that way.)
TIPS:
1. Ask yourself what you want the decision-makers to attend to: Witness credibility? Veracity of a statement or description? The certainty of a conclusion versus an opinion? Relevance? Consistency of testimony? Verbal cues? Non-verbal tics? Client likability? And the like.
2. What is the setting? Focus group research versus mock trial versus mediation, and so on.
3. What do you want to come away with that will enhance your chance at verdict success?
4. In focus group research you can do it both ways: play the testimony with and without the sound and synced scrolling text. You can inquire of the research participants: who noticed what? some may have attended to the non-verbal cues of the deponent; others may pick up on tone of voice and the emphasis (or not) on certain words.
5. Once you determine the research or trial strategy then you can employ the tools to accomplish it.
6. Think before you scroll.